Make a friend!

Join a laid-back, close-knit community of mixed interests Get a free account!

Parent: What are you reading?

  1. #616472013-07-25 16:13:55 *johan_5179 said:


    After 1Q84, i was positively lusting for more Murakami. I forced a friend to buy this so that I could borrow this and told him he could expect it back....NEVER. I am just 15 pages in, and I can see this will go well. Preconceptions? Just read the fucking description, you will know it too.

    Kafka Tamura runs away from home at fifteen, under the shadow of his father's dark prophesy. The aging Nakata, tracker of lost cats, who never recovered from a bizarre childhood affliction, finds his pleasantly simplified life suddenly turned upside down. As their parallel odysseys unravel, cats converse with people; fish tumble from the sky; a ghost-like pimp deploys a Hegel-spouting girl of the night; a forest harbours soldiers apparently un-aged since World War II. There is a savage killing, but the identity of both victim and killer is a riddle - one of many which combine to create an elegant and dreamlike masterpiece.

    Now that college has started, I will be with this book a while. But, this is one book I don't mind being stuck with. It does help that I read all my texts and a lot of essays in the vacations. Gives me free time which my teachers hope I'll use making notes and shit. Well, I have a much better use.

    shhh... they can never know
  2. #620972013-08-04 08:26:50 *johan_5179 said:

    Done with this.

    I tried to keep my post simple. My post about how this book, like everything Murakami writes, is so great. But the complexity of this book defeats any attempt in that direction.

    The great Russian critic M.M. Bakhtin once defined the novel as a work which is characterized by its ‘polyphony and unfinalizability’. Simply speaking, a novel is a form which allows a writer to speak in many voices, or at least many forms of the same voice, and is a work which has no binding moral code or sense of finality, even as you finish the story it tells. Each character can then be seen as a symbol for an idea, and even though his story comes to an end, when seen through Bakhtin’s lens the end will be ‘forced’ since what the symbol stands for is an edifice which has no ending in normal human terms. While one may be tempted to say that the same is true for all forms of writing, Bakhtin (very successfully) contrasts the free-flowing novel with the fixed nature of the epic with its rigid morals.

    Why was this verbal diarrhoea important? Because Murakami, in his infinite wisdom, manages to bring together these two forms with all their trappings to flesh out tales of a calm vibrancy which is expansive in scope but yet intensely personal. He plays around with concepts of reality, morality, the supernatural and what-not and still manages to keep it close enough so that you, dear reader, will never feel left out. Which is something I cant do in one small post. And i'm not even that profound :(

    I think that studying his background can help me understand his writings better, but irl stuff stops me. And yes, 1Q84 is the better book, don't ask me why, I just feel it.

    With this, my goal for next months book fair is decided. I am going to buy some more of Murakami. Happy reading!