Make a friend!

Join a laid-back, close-knit community of mixed interests Get a free account!

99th percentile

Gargron joined on May 2nd, 2010, since that has made 1273 posts that are still accessible today, 158 of which are threads. Helping shape the community, Gargron has given 2304 upvotes, and was last online on Jun 29th, 2016.

  • In CL Song Covers

  • In CL Song Covers

  • In CL Song Covers

    I forgot to post these here.....

  • In The Colo(u)rless UK

    @Taro_Tanako Yeah but Theresa May and the Tories want to exit the ECHR as well. Tories don't like when humans have rights

  • In Post the song that matches your current feeling in life.

  • In New Musical Instruments

    My problem with the digital ones is, they're innovating the interface, but the actual sound generation is the same as on other types of synths. I would love to see more new analogue instruments. I only know of this one, which I am sure I made a thread about before or mentioned in some way:

  • In mspaintCL

    This gif contains a cat, so it's great

  • In CL Song Covers

    Me covering a few Nick Drake songs:

    Clothes of Sand:

    River Man:

    When I say cover, both guitar and vocals are mine

  • In Things you (don't) need to know in CL

    It's interesting to see the bugs and quirks being discovered :D

  • In Do you need evidence to believe in God or any other greater power? *Please read description first*

    Disagree with "atheists need faith to not believe in God". Not believing in God is a natural state of being - you are born into this world as a blank slate, as such, without any faith in God, and there is no evidence i this world that points to a God existing as a concept at all. The way you acquire faith is because somebody tells you about God (could be a book, same thing). There is simply no reason to believe in any such thing, so why some people believe that takes something active (like "faith" in the opposite) I don't know.

    Russel's teapot:

    Many orthodox people speak as though it were the business of sceptics to disprove received dogmas rather than of dogmatists to prove them. This is, of course, a mistake. If I were to suggest that between the Earth and Mars there is a china teapot revolving about the sun in an elliptical orbit, nobody would be able to disprove my assertion provided I were careful to add that the teapot is too small to be revealed even by our most powerful telescopes. But if I were to go on to say that, since my assertion cannot be disproved, it is intolerable presumption on the part of human reason to doubt it, I should rightly be thought to be talking nonsense. If, however, the existence of such a teapot were affirmed in ancient books, taught as the sacred truth every Sunday, and instilled into the minds of children at school, hesitation to believe in its existence would become a mark of eccentricity and entitle the doubter to the attentions of the psychiatrist in an enlightened age or of the Inquisitor in an earlier time.